p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-indent: 36.0px; font: 12.0px ‘Courier New’}
More on Revising
I’m currently editing my first novel, Gaia’s Hands, for perhaps the fourth time. Most writers would have delegated this to a drawer forever, but I’m going to use it as a learning tool. And, damn it, I’m stubborn.
The biggest thing I have had to do so far is remove two main characters, Annie and Eric. Not completely, mind you — they remain in the story, but not as main characters. I had read somewhere that more than two main characters distracts from the story, because we experience the story through the main characters. So we’re down to the seemingly mismatched couple I’ve mentioned before — Josh Young, the English major exploring his Asian American heritage and Jeanne Beaumont, the much older college professor who lives in the world of science.
Removing the first person POV for two characters resulted in removing two subplots, which I could do. But it also lost maybe 15,000 words, and publishers in SF/Fantasy now expect 75,000-110,000 words in their submissions. (Tea with the Black Dragon, which was nominated for the Hugo and Nebula the year it came out, would not pass in today’s market). Adding 15,000 words to an existing novel without it looking added on? Slapping two chapters in won’t do it. However, I’ve gotten the opportunity to look through the document with wiser — and older — eyes, identifying places where I erred in the following ways:
- Loaded Chekhov’s Gun and dropped it (foreshadowing wasted)
- Left plot holes (or as my grad advisor said, “I can’t grade you on what’s in your head”
- Missed opportunities to develop secondary characters (although they’re not primary characters, they deserve not to be two-dimensional)
- Added more menace (poor Jeanne. Death threats, rocks through her window, and a break-in at her greenhouse.)
Short poem
Character Sheets and Why You Need Them
One of the best ways to keep your characters from becoming one big blur such that you can’t tell the difference is the character sheet. I have seen character sheets developed in a notebook in colored ink (What’re you up to these days, Ashley?), as templates for Word, or in software programs such as Scrivener.
At the very least, a character sheet for each main character will help you remember their traits and how they affect the story. Otherwise, it’s entirely possible to have one of your characters fall out of — well, character. For example, one of the themes in my writing is how pacifism has always been a minority position in the US. Therefore I have a lot of pacifistic characters living at the ecocollective that houses many of my novels, and other characters who are not pacifists but have agreed to non-violent rules to live in the collective. And then there’s Gideon, who was brought up by a Quaker mother, but couldn’t resist throwing a punch from time to time. I have to remember which ones are which to be consistent; thus, character sheets.
Character sheets also keep authors consistent from book to book. Case in point: One of my favorite books, one that makes me happy-weepy to read, is Tea with the Black Dragon, by R. A. MacAvoy. One of the protagonists is Oo Long, a mysterious Eurasian man who is more than he seems. Without giving away the plot, Oo Long, besides being the name of a tea, translates to “Black Dragon”. One of my least favorite books is Twisting the Rope, the sequel to Tea with the Black Dragon. My reason for disliking the latter book is because the character of Oo Long changes drastically with no explanation. In fact, his skin is described as “black” in the latter book. At the very least, the author needs to explain why a protagonist has changed color.
The first time I saw a character sheet was 30-some years ago, long before I started writing novels. It looked much like this: (Dungeons and Dragons, 2017).
Sorry for the mouse print. Anyone who has played an RPG recognizes this sheet, or something much like it. (My character was a female half-elf wizard with extreme beauty and maxed-out charisma. Hello, wish fulfillment!)
More pertinent to the discussion — this character sheet does a pretty good job for writers despite its obsession on quantifying character skills and its focus on fighting. I could see this working for sword and sorcery or even urban dystopia with fight scenes.
This next one I looked up on the Internet, a veritable treasure trove of character sheets. I love this sheet:
This sheet has so much detail, it would almost work as an intake assessment form in case management — all it’s missing is the mental status exam. I think I could use this form while discussing with my husband the fine points of a character over a three-hour coffee date. On the other hand, I have a novel with 65 characters, for which I have at least partial character sheets. Imagine filling this doc out for 65 characters!
The third character sheet is what I use, because it’s electronic and because it’s bundled with my storywriting/formatting software, Scrivener:
I prefer the simplicity of this document — I can fill this out in 20 minutes or less and get back to writing. My favorite part of this document, however, is that I can drag and drop a picture to remind me of what the character looks like!
If you were to ask me, though, which character sheet/method is the best, I would not answer with Scrivener’s document, although it’s my favorite so far. As with many other things in life, the best character sheet is the one you’ll use.
As always, sources:
Dungeons and Dragons (2017). Character sheets. Available: http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/features/character_sheets [September 6, 2017].
Lerner, T. and Walker, K. (2017). The epiguide.com guide to character sheets. Available: http://www.epiguide.com/ep101/writing/charchart.html
Scrivener [Computer software]. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.literatureandlatte.com/scrivener.php.
Self Images.
I am a whirlwind, awhirlwind, doling out fire and storm.
Wretched, I hold my head as I type this.
I ask you the question, “Tell me your meaning.” I hold you to the answer.
You watch me stride across the classroom, my hands shaping a concept as I speak.
My dimples show when I smile over my glasses at you.
You can’t stop looking at me. You can’t stop wondering. You don’t know why.
In my office, there is a collection of stuffed toy Internet-famous cats.
I clutch the railing, lest my leg gives out.
Tell me your meaning. All of your meanings.
If you can, you can create three-dimensional characters.
Editing is like popping pimples
(Trigger warning: Footnotes below)
The first stages of a novel — the writing — send my heart soaring. Discovering my characters’ quirks, finding their voice, finding MY voice, inserting moments of foreshadowing … it’s like a primitive ritual that spins into communion with Erato*.
Maybe I exaggerate. At any rate, creating a new world with new characters and new surroundings thrills me. I want to talk about writing with my husband, my friends, and anyone who will listen, all of whom react with “that’s nice” while they wonder if I’ve kept up with my lithium**.
Editing, on the other hand, feels like an exorcism. Looking through the draft for demons hiding between the sentences, suffering from boredom because there’s eighty thousand words to look through, and then finding something that doesn’t look like it should be there and wondering if it’s a demon or a cute cuddly spotted owl.
Or another extended metaphor with a side of simile: Editing feels like popping pimples — gross but necessary***. The great thing about this metaphor is that it has a happy ending: there is a certain satisfaction to popping pimples****. I’m not going to extend this metaphor any longer because — gross.
I’ve been editing for several days ***** and I can vouch that the extended metaphors are true to a point: I’ve read pages and pages the past several days with the following simultaneous charges: Make sure you take out that experimental technique the last agent who rejected you told you to take out. Make sure things still make sense from the previous changes. Make sure everyone’s still in character. Make sure the story captures people’s attention — how do I know what catches people’s attention? I’m weird. All of this while maintaining that people should be interested in agricultural back to earthers vs corrupt ag concern only with visions, Gaia-given powers, and a December-May love affair.******
But oh, when I fix something and I feel it’s right — which isn’t often — it’s so satisfying. Like popping — eww, gross!
* The ancient Greek muse of erotic poetry/lyric poetry. Why Erato? Because the ancient Greeks appeared not to write prose. None of the other muses worked — Urania, honestly?
** Lithium is the gold standard for treating bipolar disorder, particularly the manic/hypomanic stages. Currently, my lithium is trying to kill me with side effects mimicking acute toxicity, and I’m trying to get my shrink to see that my lithium is trying to kill me.
*** Dermatologists like Dr. Pimple Popper — not kidding! — would prefer you let them pop your pimples at exorbitant prices.
**** If you don’t believe this, Dr. Pimple Popper’s videos have almost 8 million views on YouTube.
***** when my lithium hasn’t been trying to kill me
******I meant “December-May”. She’s 50; he’s 20. I like making you uncomfortable with things like older women and younger men.
Viewpoints and meaning
One of the big decisions a writer has to make when writing a novel is viewpoint. Viewpoint determines whose “voice” carries the novel or how much of the action is revealed. There are several viewpoints, courtesy of Orges (2011) that can be used.
I’m going to attempt to illustrate examples using things I’ve written (in a book or off the top of my head) because none of you have read the same books, and I tend to read genre fiction because Umberto Eco hurts my already aching head. The viewpoints below are proposed by Orges; the examples are mine.
- First Person Protagonist — the hero of the story narrates the story. I usually write first person because I love getting into people’s heads:
I stood at the railing of the ship. The wind disturbed me, as there were no clouds in the sky or on the horizon to cause it. What the devil could it be?
I yelled to my Captain, who stood beside me scrutinizing the sky. “This looks to be a most unusual storm.
“I see that, ye idiot!” he yelled; I hardly heard him. “You’re the genius — what the hell do you think be causing it?”
I walked off, lest I lose patience. I peered at a corner of the sky where I spied a large, rather gaudy balloon.
- Secondary Character — the narrator tells the story of the hero. Secondary character narration tends to emphasize how heroic or
“I see that, ye idiot,” the Captain bellowed back. “You’re the genius — what the hell do you think be causing it?”
Bob walked off, peering at a corner of the sky where he spied a large, rather gaudy balloon.
- Third Person Intimate — the viewpoint follows one person, as if sitting on his shoulder watching him, but cannot get into his head.
“Bob stood at the railing of the ship, looking toward the calm western horizon. “Captain,” he shouted to the man next to him, the wind swallowing his words. “This looks to be a most unnatural storm.”
“I see that, ye idiot,” the Captain bellowed back. “You’re the genius — what the hell do you think be causing it?”
Bob walked off, peering at a corner of the sky where he spied a large, rather gaudy balloon.
- Third Person Limited — the viewpoint follows the action but cannot get into people’s heads.
Bob stood at the railing of the ship, looking toward the calm western horizon. He was not the only one; the other men above deck peered and muttered in the wind that had suddenly blown up. Belowdeck, men bounced off walls as the ship began to list.
“Captain,” he shouted to the man next to him, the wind swallowing his words. “This looks to be a most unnatural storm.”
“I see that, ye idiot,” the Captain bellowed back. “You’re the genius — what the hell do you think be causing it?”
Bob strode off, peering at a corner of the sky where he spied a large, rather gaudy balloon.
- Third Person Omniscient — the viewpoint follows the action, can get into people’s heads — there’s no limit to what the viewpoint sees
Bob stood at the railing of the ship, looking toward the calm western horizon. The fact that the winds worked themselves to gale force without any clouds disturbed him. Was it magic? he wondered. He was not the only one; the other men above deck peered and muttered in the wind that had suddenly blown up. Belowdeck, men bounced off walls as the ship began to list.
“I see that, ye idiot,” the Captain bellowed back. “You’re the genius — what the hell do you think be causing it?”
Bob strode off, peering at a corner of the sky where he spied a large, rather gaudy balloon.
- Commentator (works with any of these): An uninvolved third person, but with a first person insert that gives opinions, observations, etc.
“I see that, ye idiot,” the Captain bellowed back. “You’re the genius — what the hell do you think be causing it?” On the other hand, our Captain seems almost stereotypically illiterate. Now’s a good time to pull out his grog and swig it, amirite?
Bob strode off, peering at a corner of the sky where he spied a large, rather gaudy balloon.
- Somewhere in-between:
- Interviewer — an after the fact, detached interviewer who gets one or more characters to tell the story. This allows the writer to slip between present and past:
I peered at a corner of the sky where I spied a large, rather gaudy balloon…
- Secret Narrator — a person who appears to have nothing to do with the plot, but is revealed later to be one of
the main characters (good or bad) That means you won’t know the significance of this till later.
Belowdeck, in the head, Cookie the cook prayed as he clutched his St. Christopher’s medal. He hated storms, had hated them since he was a wee child and his cradle had washed into the sea during a flood. He had been rescued by a stranger, a man who had brought him up.
As his guardian had told him, however, his days were numbered and the seas would have him back. And now it looked to come true …
- Unreliable Narrator — a narrator (first or third person) whose observations are not to be trusted because of ulterior motives, insanity, etc.
I heard Bob talk to the Captain as if he’d been the first person to notice the wind picking up. He was far from the first — I felt the wind pick up first; I saw the mild sky. Nothing to see here, move along; except for Bob, who was bucking for Captain’s job.
You may wonder why I haven’t covered second person:
Bob, go talk to the Captain about that wind you felt. Make sure you tell him about the lack of clouds. And the water balloon. Then be sure to find a way to work around him given he’s an apathetic old sot.
See what that’s like to read? In small doses, maybe.
By the way, this is the hardest blog I’ve ever written!
Citation: Orges, S.M. (2011). The 7 narrator types: And you thought there were only two! Available: http://bekindrewrite.com/2011/09/09/the-7-narrator-types-and-you-thought-there-were-only-two/ [September 3, 2017]
Clothing and Characterization
I wear t-shirts and jeans for casual wear, classic-cut blazers and slacks and long skirts for work, and Bearcat Green sweats for football games. I wear a wedding band with Celtic knotwork and a Claddagh ring as an engagement ring. When I wear other jewelry, I wear vintage pieces that my mom left for me when she died. Currently, my nails are painted a color-changing green. In a back closet, I have period peasant wear to wear to the Renaissance festival.
What does that tell you about who I am? About who I’m not?
We are all Sherlock Holmes, deducing other people by their outsides. We look at hair — my short choppy hair makes people think I’m a lesbian — which can be very flattering. We look at accessories — a MAGA hat or black lipstick inform us on what category to put a stranger. We look at clothing — today, I’m wearing a Lil Bub t-shirt and jeans to work, and as I’m the professor, it will confuse a few of my new students who don’t realize Friday is my Jeans Day.
According to cognitive psychology, putting people in categories based on their clothing is a heuristic, or information-processing shortcut, called the representativeness heuristic. Does appearance tell us everything about a person? No! Marilyn Manson, grotesque goth that he is, is reportedly a very nice man. The woman in soccer-mom jeggings could be a clown on weekends. Therefore, the representativeness heuristic doesn’t tell us the whole truth, However, as people do dress to express their personality, we can use descriptions of clothing as a shorthand for personality.
I woke up this morning realizing that a book I wrote, Voyageurs, depends heavily on clothing as characterization. One character, Cat Pleskovich, wears leggings and tank tops to fit her dancer’s figure and daredevil tendencies. Another, Ian Akimoto, has very little clothing to his name because he lives in an impoverished, barren future. However, as a time traveler, Ian uses Method acting techniques, including dressing for character and time period, to fit in wherever he lands.
*****
Part of the intro of Voyageurs, made of clothing and impressions:
May 19, 1814 (Kat)
I stepped out of shadow and paid my entrance at the gate. I had dressed like a gentleman, and the suit set off my tall stature. I strode confidently through the gate of Vauxhall Gardens, as men do. From a grandstand, some musicians played something I didn’t recognize, something that sounded jaunty and Germanic.
A woman in widow’s weeds passed through the gate right behind me like a wraith. She would receive scorn not only because she walked in unaccompanied, but because she marred her period of mourning for frivolities. I admired her gall and wished I could accompany her to reduce some of the harsh judgments against her, but she slipped away before I could offer.
Besides, I had come here to solve a mystery. Someone had left a note in my (Twenty-First Century) mailbox that read, I know you are a Traveller. Meet me at Vauxhall Gardens at 8:00 PM on May 19, 1814. I will be on the first bench beyond the lights to your right.
One purpose of a pleasure garden, I had read, was to provide dark nooks for dalliance. An unintended consequence, however, was the presence of thieves. I walked with purpose, head up, smelling an elusive whiff of a cheroot on the breeze and hearing two gentlemen as they passed me, talking of an assignation.
I thought I knew of all the Travellers. A few of us had met up recently at the 1904 World’s Fair, Wanda and Harold and I, to see the wonders unveiled there. We had connected by email to set a rendezvous, as we lived in far-flung cities, and Wanda had to make her face look pale under her bonnet because St. Louis had been even more racist then. We all ate ice cream cones, of course.
As I walked toward the dark, I felt the note in my pocket as a talisman. My foray into meeting an unknown Traveller could endanger me. I carried a sword cane, standard for gentlemen of this era, as defense. I walked toward the first bench to the right, in the darkness, and I spied the widow there. She had pulled knitting from her bag and set to it. Through her veil, I thought she watched me.
I ventured into the deeper darkness, and her words, said in a husky voice, startled me. “You are not a man. You walk like a woman.”
I looked at the dark figure, and I noticed – “You sit like a man.”
“Katerina Pleskovich,” the other said in a voice slightly changed. “It’s good to see you in person.”
“Okay,” I said sternly, “You have the advantage on me, and that makes you look like a stalker.”
“Ian Akimoto,” he said, standing and pushing back his bonnet. In the moonlight, he was truly post-racial with glossy dark hair, wide-set Asian eyes, a long, thin nose, full lips. And an odd swirl of freckles on his high cheekbones. Not handsome, exactly, but perhaps appealing. Incongruously, I chuckled.
*****
p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px ‘Times New Roman’} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px ‘Times New Roman’; min-height: 15.0px} p.p3 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-indent: 20.2px; font: 12.0px ‘Times New Roman’} p.p4 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-indent: 22.5px; font: 12.0px ‘Times New Roman’}
p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-indent: 20.4px; font: 12.0px ‘Times New Roman’}
What do you know about Kat from her appearance? What do you know about Ian? Where were they wrong about each other, just from appearance? That’s the power of playing with clothing, appearance, and characterization.
Imaginary Critters I Have Known
At age 3, I could not talk. I could only utter “Ducka ducka ducka.” I think I cemented my reputation as the “weird kid” at that time, and it has never really gone away. I’ve gotten used to it.
- The Spidies. Imagine your hands crawling up someone’s back like spiders. (My sister had a spelling list in third grade with the words “tiny, silent, spider). They talk in squeaky voices, except for Freudian spidie, who misinterprets every phallic symbol in a bored professor voice. My favorite is very tiny very silent spidie, who is very shy.
- Mr. Snail. Make your hand into a snail with index and middle finger sticking out. He talks in a slow, mellifluous voice. He has daredevil tendencies, enjoying slamdancing and mountain climbing — S-L-O-W-L-Y. His goal is to run a marathon.
- Cute Fluffy Wide-Eyed Things That Love You. These are fifth-dimentional creatures made of iridescent fluff, like round dandelion silk. (For the Trekkies out there, think of Cute Fluffies as the souls of Tribbles.) We can’t see them. Pantomime shaping these with your hands while chortling or cooing, then throwing them at someone with a perky “pop!” People usually laugh. Sometimes they raise eyebrows.
- The Monsters. Make your hand into a fist. Big Mean Monster growls; Beefcake yells “Beefcake” in a village idiot voice, and Little Brother says “Grr” in a much less convincing voice. They all will fall into a happy puddle if you hug them or tell them you love them.
I’ve killed my darlings thoroughly dead
You may have heard that no less than Allan Ginsberg (or Faulkner, or Eudora Welty, or Stephen King) said about writing, “Kill your Darlings”. In actuality, a man named Arthur Quiller-Couch in 1915, and what he actually said was, “Murder Your Darlings”. (Slate, 2017). By “darlings”, he meant those cherished ideas that the writer put in the first draft of the book that don’t improve plots, themes, or readability.
Yesterday, I thoroughly killed my darlings in Gaia’s Hands, my first book and the one that just went through its latest round of rejections. Knowing what I know now about plot, theme, and readability, I proceeded to take my knife and do the following to the first third of the book:
1) Reduce the number of “first person characters” from four back to the original two. The story really belongs to Josh and Jeanne anyway.
2) Tweak out parts of the story that related to Eric and Annie’s first person viewpoint. Many words were lost.
3) Put more emphasis on the escalating threat to Jeanne and her reasoning not to tell anyone. If there’s a “main” character of the remaining two, it’s Jeanne.
There’s a lot of work to do, because I’m likely to lose 1/3 of this book cutting out some of the “fun” but uninformative scenes, and will have to fill in with things that better advance the story.
It’s going to be impossible to show you the changes, because it’s difficult to point out what’s missing and why this hunk of deleted prose deserved to die. Instead, I will give you the first threat Jeanne receives, which seems really par for the course for an academic:
p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 10.0px 0.0px; text-indent: 27.0px; font: 12.0px ‘Times New Roman’} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 10.0px 0.0px; text-indent: 45.5px; font: 12.0px ‘Times New Roman’} p.p3 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 10.0px 0.0px; text-indent: 45.5px; font: 12.0px ‘Times New Roman’; min-height: 15.0px}

